User talk:Medos2
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Image:Anna Friel.jpg
[edit]Hi, thanks for uploading Image:Anna Friel.jpg but unfortunately it's not a free image so it has been deleted. The image was licensed under the "Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommericial-Sharealike" license. Attribution means if the image is re-used the author must be credited, "Sharealike" means that if it's re-used it must be under the same license (so others can keep using it). Those 2 are fine, but the non-commercial is the hitch. Although Wikipedia is not a commercial website, it aims to be re-usable for any purpose, even if that's commercial so we don't accept images under that license.
Also (but only in the case of this image) it appears to be a screenshot of a tv show, Pushing Daisies. This means that it is copyrighted to the producers of the show and that person on flickr is not allowed to release it under a Creative Commons license.
- On flickr, the only images that can be used for Wikipedia are those showing these (or just one of them)
. - The images that can't be used are copyrighted or show either or both of these
Thanks for taking the time to upload photos, Wikipedia needs more images, it's just a shame that more people don't freely license their work. :) James086Talk | Email 13:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:MaryHarney.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:MaryHarney.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:JackieHealyRae.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JackieHealyRae.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:MichealMartin.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MichealMartin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rettetast (talk • contribs) 12:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Warning users
[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. MSGJ (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there
Just dropping a note to say that I have responded at my talk page. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 11:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Medos, thanks for paying attention. However, it seems to me that lidocaine and procaine are in fact distinct from cocaine in terms of their chemical structure and thus their naming and the class of molecules to which they belong (outlined in Template:Local anesthetics), but I'll bow to your wisdom as a pharmacy student. The explanatory link you gave me to emedicine is dead, but I believe I found the same article via google, which explains the similarity based on the amine and aromatic ends nicely. I still think some mention could be made of their chemical difference, especially for lidocaine which has different metabolism, solubility, and allergic potential. My intention with that edit was just to give an example to the lay person, and I think that has merit. Thanks again, this is a stimulating discussion.- Draeco (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Chlordiazepoxide revert
[edit]You reverted deletion of mouse sperm toxicity at doses of 80mg/kg. This is not agreed as relevant toxicity of the substance. See talk page: Clutter. 70.137.178.160 (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Clonazepam revert
[edit]You have reincluded a claimed relation to quinazolines, which is irrelevant to the pharmacology of the substance. It is a spurious association from being investigated together with quinazolines in the ref. You are vandalizing the article. 70.137.178.160 (talk) 21:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
POV pushing, heavy POV pushing
[edit]You have accused me of POV pushing, because I removed vandalism, namely inclusion of false and irrelevant citations. What would be my point of view? One citation says really something else, the other on is a rat experiment, but no agreed fact, and should not be included in an encyclopedia. 70.137.178.160 (talk) 20:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Anon user
[edit]Medos, I think that you have been following the problems with the anon user from the residential unit. They started criticising my edits again and the argument has started up again. When is this person going to get banned??? You seem to know administrators. What can be done? Check out the temazepam talk page. I am cracking up with frustration.--Literaturegeek (talk) 10:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Medos, see: we resolved the dispute. I like the Chlordiazepoxide page now. Why so complicated? (The crazy anon) 70.137.138.242 (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
That's really good. I hope you don't get too bothered over the reverts I did earlier. It wasn't meant to be too personal. It's just that I wanted things to be gone over properly. Hopefully no hard feelings. How do you mean complicated? I don't quite follow. Medos (talk • contribs) 08:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
complicated, because in the course I became the crazy, raving lunatic, pro-drug, psychotic, drug-impaired Anon-Stalker, suffering from sedative hypnotic abuse, causing impaired judgment. So I would have to be banned, reported, forbidden. (Lynched?) I noticed that the whole discussion is highly polarized around abuse issues. I think I had valid points to make. 70.137.163.38 (talk) 11:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok I hope that you're not trying to quote me in this. I've barely participated in the exchange and I've definitely not accused you of anything other than being somewhat unreasonable during it. I've never used the terms "banned, reported, forbidden lynched" in the context of this discussion. Medos (talk • contribs) 12:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
No, this was a reply to Literature, above, selling me as lunatic troll. I think I had valid points to make, and I have now made them. Thank you for your contributions. 70.137.190.187 (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop ASAP
[edit]Pls stop installing scrollboxes on refs; they are specifically disallowed as they don't mirror or print. I'm looking for that guideline now, but please stop and reverse all of them in the meantime. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok will do. Sorry Medos (talk • contribs) 17:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think they look very cool as well, but as per Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Scrolling_lists, we can't use them. Sorry. Tim Vickers (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the dashed message, Medos; back now with more time (wanted to get them all before they spread like wildfire :-)). I think we got them all? Yes, Tim likes them, too, but they cause problems, so shouldn't be used in refs. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I haven't yet. I did quite a lot. But I'm undoing them. Won't take too long. Medos (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Just noticed reverting from the other end. Yeah all done now. Sorry for causing chaos. Medos (talk • contribs) 17:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- No chaos, and I'm sorry my message sounded alarming; I just saw how fast you were moving, and wanted to save us all the effort, so I dashed off a fast message to you before I had time to find the guideline :-)) Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
No worries. Cheers for letting me know. I can only progress if I learn from these mistakes. Medos (talk • contribs) 17:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!) |
-- Addbot (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
T.F.AlHammouri (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
I have been working to create an organized categorization of pharmacology articles at WT:PHARM:CAT, and, if avaliable, wanted to get your feedback on that page? kilbad (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_McCloud&action=historysubmit&diff=405611980&oldid=401119655 --Gwern (contribs) 02:38 3 January 2011 (GMT)
Proposed Image Deletion
[edit]
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
UOJComm (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
[edit]One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
WikiMedicine
[edit]Hi
I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.
Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.
Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
[edit] | The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services Outreach Get involved  ...Support Open Access...  |
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 19:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
[edit] | The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services Outreach Get involved ...Support Open Access... |
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
- Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
- Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
- If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.
The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.
BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
[edit]Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Medical Translation Newsletter
[edit]
Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce
This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.
note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject MedicineSpotlight - Simplified article translation
Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.
Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
- WHO's list of Essential Medicines[1]
- Neglected tropical diseases[2]
- Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.
We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.
What's happening?
- IEG grant
I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
- Wikimania 2014
For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
- Integration progress
There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
- Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May. - Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie. - Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration - Arabic
The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
- Integration guides
Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [3]
News in short
- To come
- Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
- Proofreading drives
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
 |
Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Medos2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
[edit]Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
[[User:Medos2|'''<font color="#228B22">M<font color="#228B22">e<font color="#228B22">d</font>o</font>s</font>''']] <sup> ([[User talk:Medos2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Medos2|contribs]])</sup>: Medos (talk • contribs)
to
[[User:Medos2|'''<span style="color: #228B22">M<span style="color: #228B22">e<span style="color: #228B22">d</span>o</span>s</span>''']] <sup> ([[User talk:Medos2|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Medos2|contribs]])</sup>: Medos (talk • contribs)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Medos2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)